So what is sexier Briefs, Boxers or going commando? What's your opinion?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Hello all, This is a blog of questions; whimsical, deep and delving. I will ask them, and I hope to have random people answer them anonymously. Most will be of a sexual nature, but I am not looking for pornographic material just honest opinions or facts. This is a public site so keep your posts as academic as the censors would appreciate:) If you feel you need to say something but are pretty sure it should be said in private feel free to email me your response.
3 comments:
Does that presume that females are as visual as males supposedly are, and judge sexiness on visual qualities? Boxers remind me of Grandpa underwear--or the Dick Van Dyke, twin bed style of safe suburban life, so not boxers.
Briefs are so...utilitarian. Sexy, maybe, sometimes. But intrinsically, no.
Sexy is in the mind of the beholder. The pose, the attitude, the context--those determine sexy more than boxers or briefs.
However, tight jeans, unbuttoned and slightly unzipped,...different situation entirely. That's a visual that resonants. (until you put the jeans on Jack Black or Ben Stiller--then it's just creepy)
commando!
I would have to say boxers. Briefs are the old man underwear for me and commando is well, with jeans a little painful at times. I prefer no cloths, but when they're there I need me some boxers.
Post a Comment